Wednesday, October 12, 2016

犹他情况

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/USANews/32299729.html

发信人: CoolidgePalm (), 信区: USANews
标  题: 犹他情况
关键字: 犹他
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Oct 12 13:28:47 2016, 美东)

我今天给我过去在犹他的邻居和朋友的妈妈打电话聊了一会儿,她们都是咱爸妈那代人
,都对犹他的选情很担心,都不想让犹他帮希拉里胜选,她们都看透了她,烦死她了,
但年青一代人,不了解,电视又老放川普的负面新闻,她们都试图说服身边的朋友家人
,但很多人真的是on the high horse,说他们的道德不让他们支持川普。她们也很着急
难过,但也没办法,也不明白为啥他们都这么固执,看不到big picture 。我贴一段脸
书上朋友写的东西吧。请大家轻点拍砖,有时候人真的很傻很天真, 我们只能像这个版
上的一朋友说的一样:只行好事,莫问前程。我会继续通过脸书影响他们,我现在住的
弗罗里达,也很重要,我只要有机会就找我的朋友们聊聊,只能找很好的朋友才能劝她
们,一般的朋友不好意思明显的试图影响人家,谁也不傻。以下是我朋友在脸书上写的。
Utah may make a mistake this election, in my view...  If we vote for the
very late to the party McMullin (3rd party candidate), and if he beats Trump
in Utah....it could potentially hand the national victory to Hillary
Clinton. I think the consequences of this would be negative and many. I'll
just enumerate a few: Clinton has demonstrably lied under oath twice (under
very different situations), she has denigrated her husband's rape accusers,
she supports partial birth abortion (full term abortion), she supports
liberal social issues of various kinds which tend to lean against private
and institutional religious freedom, her foreign policy track record is
strongly lacking (Lybia. Syria, Iraq, Russia, etc). 

This next President will choose 2-3 Supreme Court Justices, and dozens of
federal Judges, which has implications for future laws and implementations
of laws.

Clinton's economic policies are not founded in what I believe to be sound
principles of the Austrian, Hayek, Laffer, etc. type.

Your vote does count. Clinton or Trump will be President. You help decide.
In my view, a vote for a 3rd-party candidate is a vote for either Trump or
Clinton, depending on which 3rd-party candidate. 

Trump is extremely likely to win Utah. But I believe Utah may be susceptible
to what I consider a misguided belief that McMullin is an answer to a
desperate situation.

No comments:

Post a Comment